Ship Emissions Register

Container ship · Liberia flag · built 2006

MSC TOKATA F

IMO 9347970 6 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2023
543 t
Fuel burned
172 t
Time at sea
182 h
Emitted at berth
4% of total
Share of year under way
2%
Gross tonnage
9,948
MSC TOKATA F
Farid mernissi, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9347970
Previously reported as
TOKATA
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
9,948
Length overall
147.8 m
Year built
2006
Flag state
Liberia
Builder
Yangzhou Binjiang Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (21.8 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked, under_transportarbeidsgulv (2023)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2024-04-12
Compliance document expires
2025-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 8,307 t20188,3072019: 7,932 t20192020: 7,123 t20202021: 9,702 t20212022: 7,990 t20222023: 543 t2023543

Between 2018 and 2023 reported CO₂ fell by 93.5%.

From 2022 to 2023, emissions fell 93.2% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 11.8%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2023

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2023 543 172 182 23 295.8 44.1 not ranked
2022 7,990 2,532 30,208 2,994 383 264.5 47.0 92
2021 9,702 3,110 32,834 3,034 357 295.5 54.8 97
2020 7,123 2,284 2,227 325 309.3 58.3 not ranked
2019 7,932 2,544 26,435 3,815 473 300.1 58.6 47
2018 8,307 2,665 36,010 4,578 341 230.7 35.3 42

Where the 2023 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 23 t23Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 164 t164Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 356 t356

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2019DNVGermany

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
6
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage