Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Panama flag · built 2014

PEWEE

IMO 9740160 EU ETS3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2024
7,264 t
Fuel burned
2,312 t
Time at sea
2,771 h
Share of year under way
32%
PEWEE
Farid mernissi, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9740160
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Year built
2014
Flag state
Panama
Builder
Imabari Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (7.2 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2025-09-30
Compliance document expires
2026-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2022

Position 2,040 of 3,692 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 55th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 8.4; this vessel reported 8.8.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 55th percentile, EEOI 8.8

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 450,690,396 tonn-nmover 18,111 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2020: 2,345 t20202,3452022: 3,989 t20222024: 7,264 t20247,264

Between 2020 and 2024 reported CO₂ rose by 209.7%. No return is recorded for 2021, 2023, so the series has gaps.

From 2022 to 2024, emissions rose 82.1% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 0.9%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2020–2024

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2024 7,264 2,312 2,771 0 218.3
2022 3,989 1,264 18,111 1,445 259 220.2 8.8 55
2020 2,345 743 10,379 800 115 226.0 7.2 38

Where the 2024 emissions occurred

Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 387 t387Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 286 t286Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 2,964 t2,964Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 3,627 t3,627

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2024

Total CO₂ equivalent
7,377 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.12 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.42 t
Under EU ETS
3,968 t, 55% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
3 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage