Oil tanker · Norway flag · built 2010
SKS DOKKA
IMO 9461831 EU ETS6 reporting years
- CO₂ reported 2025
- 0 t
- Gross tonnage
- 65,830
Vessel particulars
- IMO number
- 9461831
- Previously reported as
- TORM GANGA
- Ship type
- Oil tanker
- Gross tonnage
- 65,830
- Length overall
- 250.0 m
- Beam
- 45.0 m
- Year built
- 2010
- Flag state
- Norway
- Builder
- HD Hyundai Samho
- Port of registry
- Singapore
- Technical efficiency (design)
- EEXI (3.24 gCO₂/t·nm)
- Verifier
- DNV, Germany
- Accreditation
- VS-16026-01
- Compliance document issued
- 2026-01-19
- Compliance document expires
- 2027-06-30
Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.
Efficiency against its own type2024
Position 257 of 1,566 qualifying oil tankers by EEOI, at the 16th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 7.6; this vessel reported 4.9.
EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 1,757,065,844 tonn-nmover 17,758 nautical miles.
Reported CO₂ by year
Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 100.0%. No return is recorded for 2021, 2022, so the series has gaps.
Annual returns2018–2025
| Year | CO₂ (t) | Fuel (t) | Distance (nm) | At sea (h) | At berth (t) | kg CO₂/nm | EEOI | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 8,539 | 2,731 | 17,758 | 1,581 | 319 | 480.9 | 4.9 | 16 |
| 2023 | 4,141 | 1,328 | 10,364 | 874 | 113 | 399.6 | 6.9 | 38 |
| 2020 | 8,715 | 2,768 | 21,025 | 2,569 | 554 | 414.5 | 6.8 | 30 |
| 2019 | 10,973 | 3,501 | 23,761 | 2,660 | 401 | 461.8 | 6.5 | 28 |
| 2018 | 14,154 | 4,510 | 31,857 | 3,869 | 477 | 444.3 | 6.7 | 31 |
Verifier history
| From reporting year | Verifier | Accredited in |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | VERIFAVIA (UK) LTD | United Kingdom |
| 2020 | NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS | France |
| 2023 | DNV | Germany |
A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.
Sources and how to read this
- Emissions: EU MRV publication (THETIS-MRV), reporting years 2018–2025, published by the European Commission.
- Vessel particulars: Wikidata (CC0).
What this page is built on
- Reporting years
- 6
- Ranked by efficiency
- yes
- Vessel particulars
- 5 of 5
- Movement data
- not observed
- Name history
- yes
- Photograph
- none licensed
- Sanctions record
- none
- Inspection record
- none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page
EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.
Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.
Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.
Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.
Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.
Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.
Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.
Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.
Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.
Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.