Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Marshall Islands flag · built 2014

STAR CALYPSO

IMO 9634842 EU ETS2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
2,975 t
Fuel burned
954 t
Distance
11,930 nm
Time at sea
1,148 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
13%
Gross tonnage
43,100

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9634842
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
43,100
Length overall
228.0 m
Beam
32.0 m
Year built
2014
Flag state
Marshall Islands
Builder
Tsuneishi Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Majuro
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (3.49 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-02-27
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 608 of 3,241 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 19th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 7.6; this vessel reported 5.5.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 19th percentile, EEOI 5.5

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 543,914,077 tonn-nmover 11,930 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2024: 5,479 t20245,4792025: 2,975 t20252,975

Between 2024 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 45.7%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 45.7% while distance sailed fell 28.6%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 23.9%.

Annual returns2024–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 2,975 954 11,930 1,148 51 249.4 5.5 19
2024 5,479 1,757 16,717 1,608 44 327.8 5.5 17

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 51 t51Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 51 t51Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 1,759 t1,759Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 1,165 t1,165

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
3,022 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.05 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.17 t
Under EU ETS
1,513 t, 51% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
2
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage