Ship Emissions Register

Bulk carrier · Hong Kong flag · built 2006

BLUE BALESTIER

IMO 9338539 EU ETS3 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2024
938 t
Fuel burned
301 t
Time at sea
486 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
6%
Gross tonnage
19,822

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9338539
Previously reported as
SUPER SARAH
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
19,822
Length overall
175.5 m
Beam
29.4 m
Year built
2006
Flag state
Hong Kong
Builder
Hakodate Dock
Port of registry
MAJURO
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (7.21 gCO₂/t·nm)
Efficiency ranking
Not ranked, under_transportarbeidsgulv (2024)
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2025-08-18
Compliance document expires
2026-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 0 t201802022: 4,561 t20222024: 938 t2024938

From 2022 to 2024, emissions fell 79.4% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 21.1%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2024

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2024 938 301 486 23 187.0 14.3 not ranked
2022 4,561 1,459 19,251 1,702 453 236.9 13.1 85
2018 0 0 0 0

Where the 2024 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 23 t23Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 23 t23Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 373 t373Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 202 t202Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 339 t339

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2024

Total CO₂ equivalent
953 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.02 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.05 t
Under EU ETS
667 t, 71% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2022NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
3
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage