Ship Emissions Register

Oil tanker · Cyprus flag · built 2002

CAPE BELLAVISTA

IMO 9232929 2 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2019
10,172 t
Fuel burned
3,245 t
Distance
19,156 nm
Time at sea
1,696 h
Emitted at berth
9% of total
Share of year under way
19%
Gross tonnage
81,270

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9232929
Ship type
Oil tanker
Gross tonnage
81,270
Length overall
274.0 m
Beam
48.0 m
Year built
2002
Flag state
Cyprus
Builder
HD Hyundai Mipo
Port of registry
Valetta
Technical efficiency (design)
EEDI (3.35 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING HELLENIC SINGLE MEMBER LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (ABS HELLENIC S.M. LTD), Greece
Accreditation
1083-2
Compliance document issued
2020-07-09
Compliance document expires
2021-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2019

Position 462 of 1,739 qualifying oil tankers by EEOI, at the 26th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 8.4; this vessel reported 6.3.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 26th percentile, EEOI 6.3

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 1,609,534,810 tonn-nmover 19,156 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 6,628 t20186,6282019: 10,172 t201910,172

Between 2018 and 2019 reported CO₂ rose by 53.5%.

From 2018 to 2019, emissions rose 53.5% while distance sailed rose 41.8%and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 8.2%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Annual returns2018–2019

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2019 10,172 3,245 19,156 1,696 933 531.0 6.3 26
2018 6,628 2,123 13,509 1,177 545 490.6 5.1 16

Where the 2019 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 933 t933Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 473 t473Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 4,785 t4,785Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 3,981 t3,981

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
2
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage