Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Italy flag · built 2000

CRUISE BONARIA

IMO 9204063 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
42,511 t
Fuel burned
13,599 t
Time at sea
3,423 h
Emitted at berth
13% of total
Share of year under way
39%
Gross tonnage
24,352
CRUISE BONARIA
Jacopo Tofani, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9204063
Previously reported as
KNOSSOS PALACE
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
24,352
Length overall
214.0 m
Year built
2000
Flag state
Italy
Builder
Fincantieri
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (21.01 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
RINA Services Spa, Italy
Accreditation
002O
Compliance document issued
2026-03-04
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 53,340 t201853,3402019: 55,906 t20192020: 39,554 t20202021: 73,347 t20212022: 71,737 t20222023: 59,389 t20232024: 69,651 t20242025: 42,511 t202542,511

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 20.3%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 39.0% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 9.1%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 42,511 13,599 3,423 5,510 712.9
2024 69,651 22,310 4,784 4,821 784.7
2023 59,389 19,013 4,313 5,863 804.9
2022 71,737 22,997 4,817 3,689 799.1
2021 73,347 23,514 4,068 3,599 768.5
2020 39,554 12,670 2,510 3,476 777.4
2019 55,906 17,872 3,392 3,776 785.4
2018 53,340 17,040 3,132 5,489 814.7

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 5,510 t5,510Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 5,516 t5,516Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 36,050 t36,050Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 574 t574Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 372 t372

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
43,179 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.68 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.45 t
Under EU ETS
29,380 t, 69% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage