Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Sweden flag · built 2003

DROTTEN

IMO 9223796 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
28,063 t
Fuel burned
8,905 t
Time at sea
1,816 h
Emitted at berth
11% of total
Share of year under way
21%
Gross tonnage
29,746
DROTTEN
jorchr, CC BY-SA 3.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9223796
Previously reported as
GOTLAND
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
29,746
Length overall
195.8 m
Year built
2003
Flag state
Sweden
Builder
CSSC Offshore & Marine Engineering Company
Port of registry
Visby
Ice class
IA
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (21.51 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Destination Gotland
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-17
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 67,904 t201867,9042019: 56,403 t20192020: 13,757 t20202021: 61,854 t20212022: 71,818 t20222023: 25,500 t20232024: 25,616 t20242025: 28,063 t202528,063

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 58.7%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 9.5% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 2.3%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 28,063 8,905 1,816 3,115 720.7
2024 25,616 8,130 1,688 2,258 704.8
2023 25,500 8,093 1,699 2,233 678.9
2022 71,818 22,792 5,487 3,150 593.5
2021 61,854 19,630 4,508 4,900 635.7
2020 13,757 4,366 709 3,070 859.8
2019 56,403 17,900 3,274 5,270 760.1
2018 67,904 21,550 3,791 5,670 770.8

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 3,115 t3,115Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 3,115 t3,115Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 24,948 t24,948

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
28,500 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.45 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.60 t

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018MRVControl ABSweden
2024DNVGermany

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage