Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Algeria flag · built 2005

EL DJAZAIR II

IMO 9265421 EU ETS7 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
32,751 t
Fuel burned
10,257 t
Time at sea
3,104 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
35%
Gross tonnage
20,024
EL DJAZAIR II
Jeanne Menjoulet from Paris, France, CC BY 2.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9265421
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
20,024
Length overall
146.6 m
Beam
24.0 m
Year built
2005
Flag state
Algeria
Builder
Astilleros de Sevilla
Port of registry
Algiers
Home port
Algiers
Technical efficiency (design)
EEDI (26.73 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Algérie Ferries
Verifier
Bureau Veritas Certification France, France
Accreditation
3-2047 rév. 1
Compliance document issued
2026-05-11
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2019: 44,830 t201944,8302020: 9,488 t20202021: 2,922 t20212022: 29,907 t20222023: 32,118 t20232024: 39,390 t20242025: 32,751 t202532,751

Between 2019 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 26.9%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 16.9% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 4.6%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2019–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 32,751 10,257 3,104 1,092 520.6
2024 39,390 12,493 3,775 1,110 497.6
2023 32,118 10,186 2,684 1,051 596.6
2022 29,907 9,478 2,456 1,920 604.2
2021 2,922 926 277 158 570.4
2020 9,488 3,009 782 349 634.1
2019 44,830 14,221 3,282 2,116 674.4

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 1,092 t1,092Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 1,092 t1,092Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 16,136 t16,136Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 15,523 t15,523

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
33,255 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.51 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.85 t
Under EU ETS
16,921 t, 52% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
7
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage