Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · France flag · built 1995

GIROLATA

IMO 9088859 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
41,446 t
Fuel burned
13,017 t
Time at sea
4,602 h
Emitted at berth
7% of total
Share of year under way
53%
Gross tonnage
28,417
GIROLATA
JeanGilbetCasanis, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9088859
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
28,417
Length overall
177.0 m
Beam
27.0 m
Year built
1995
Flag state
France
Builder
Fosen Yard
Port of registry
Bastia
Home port
Marseille
Ice class
IB
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (26.7 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2026-03-20
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 30,869 t201830,8692019: 29,382 t20192020: 42,171 t20202021: 44,987 t20212022: 54,032 t20222023: 41,151 t20232024: 35,006 t20242025: 41,446 t202541,446

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 34.3%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 18.4% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 4.1%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 41,446 13,017 4,602 2,796 523.8
2024 35,006 11,207 3,651 3,751 546.1
2023 41,151 13,191 4,486 2,392 530.8
2022 54,032 17,346 6,437 598 484.1
2021 44,987 14,435 5,761 1,252 467.7
2020 42,171 13,522 3,498 2,190 647.5
2019 29,382 9,407 3,416 3,092 546.5
2018 30,869 9,883 3,966 3,232 501.0

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 2,796 t2,796Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 2,796 t2,796Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 38,399 t38,399Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 252 t252

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
42,085 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.65 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.34 t
Under EU ETS
41,320 t, 100% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage