Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Greece flag · built 1998

HIGHSPEED 3

IMO 9188867 EU ETS5 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
11,756 t
Fuel burned
3,667 t
Time at sea
914 h
Emitted at berth
1% of total
Share of year under way
10%
Gross tonnage
5,992
HIGHSPEED 3
Periperi99, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9188867
Previously reported as
THUNDER
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
5,992
Length overall
86.6 m
Year built
1998
Flag state
Greece
Builder
Austal
Port of registry
PIRAEUS
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (30.3 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2026-03-30
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2021: 9,577 t20219,5772022: 10,721 t20222023: 15,113 t20232024: 12,687 t20242025: 11,756 t202511,756

Between 2021 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 22.8%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 7.3% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 5.3%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2021–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 11,756 3,667 914 65 458.3
2024 12,687 3,957 949 325 435.1
2023 15,113 4,714 1,016 388 487.7
2022 10,721 3,344 837 275 464.8
2021 9,577 2,987 608 274 524.8

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 65 t65Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 65 t65Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 11,691 t11,691

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
11,936 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.18 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.66 t
Under EU ETS
197 t, 2% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2021ICS Verification Services Single Member P.C.Greece
2024RINA HELLAS LTDGreece
2025NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
5
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage