Ship Emissions Register

LNG carrier · Bermuda flag · built 2006

LNG LOKOJA

IMO 9269960 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
5,468 t
Fuel burned
1,985 t
Time at sea
548 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
6%
Gross tonnage
98,798

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9269960
Ship type
LNG carrier
Gross tonnage
98,798
Length overall
288.2 m
Year built
2006
Flag state
Bermuda
Builder
Hanwha Ocean
Port of registry
Hamilton
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (7.3 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-02-16
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 52,163 t201852,1632019: 48,684 t20192020: 57,891 t20202021: 59,889 t20212022: 29,603 t20222023: 39,616 t20232024: 13,101 t20242025: 5,468 t20255,468

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 89.5%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 58.3% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 1.9%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 5,468 1,985 548 134 735.8
2024 13,101 4,753 1,665 292 750.2
2023 39,616 14,382 5,637 789 619.0
2022 29,603 10,743 3,679 738 742.7
2021 59,889 21,725 6,310 1,521 833.4
2020 57,891 20,895 6,359 769 778.3
2019 48,684 17,205 4,517 1,083 827.0
2018 52,163 18,449 4,130 2,137 893.2

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 134 t134Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 134 t134Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 2,775 t2,775Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 2,558 t2,558

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
5,526 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.00 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.22 t
Under EU ETS
2,801 t, 51% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage