TonneMiles

Container ship · Japan flag · built 2015

MACKINAC BRIDGE: CO₂ emissions 2018–2025

IMO 9689603 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
23,781 t
Fuel burned
7,619 t
Distance
38,158 nm
Time at sea
3,330 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
38%
Gross tonnage
152,297
MACKINAC BRIDGE
kees torn, CC BY-SA 2.0 · File

MACKINAC BRIDGE against its type

Built in 2015, it is 7 years newer than the median container ship on this register, which was built in 2008 (3,088 vessels with a known build year). At 152,297 gross tonnage it is larger than 92% of the other 3,000 container ships with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 22 container ships here under the Japan flag, 0.6% of the 3,495 on the register. Its MRV returns name it MACKINAC BRIDGE for 2018–2019 and ONE MACKINAC for 2020–2025. The returns for 2018–2025 all give KOBE as port of registry.

Its 23,781 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 45% above the median of 16,359 t among the 2,234 container ships on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 623.2 kg CO₂, 14% above the type median of 545.6 kg. It logged 3,330 hours at sea against a median of 3,155 hours for its type that year. 1.9% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for container ships was 3.2%. Across 8 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2019 (44,018 t) and the lowest 2023 (11,896 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 9 in 2018 to 15 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 4 comparable vessels listed below with a 2025 return, 0 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 23,781 7,619 38,158 3,330 462 623.2 7.6 15
2024 26,715 8,554 — 3,428 0 662.1 — —
2023 11,896 3,804 15,192 1,369 392 783.1 7.9 14
2022 12,069 3,863 14,719 1,060 1,579 820.0 9.0 16
2021 22,547 7,214 24,709 1,451 1,096 912.5 9.7 19
2020 31,867 10,127 36,246 2,762 1,296 879.2 8.1 15
2019 44,018 14,115 55,165 3,815 1,165 797.9 7.5 10
2018 31,458 10,078 40,390 2,765 1,389 778.9 7.9 9

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9689603
Previously reported as
ONE MACKINAC
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
152,297
Length overall
365.9 m
Year built
2015
Flag state
Japan per EU MRV 2025
Port of registry
Kobe MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (8.74 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-27
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 271 of 1,838 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 15th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 14.2; this vessel reported 7.6.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 15th percentile, EEOI 7.6

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 3,137,287,599 tonne-miles over 38,158 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 31,458 t201831,4582019: 44,018 t20192020: 31,867 t20202021: 22,547 t20212022: 12,069 t20222023: 11,896 t20232024: 26,715 t20242025: 23,781 t202523,781

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 24.4% lower than in 2018, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 11.0% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 5.9%.Distance is missing for at least one of the two years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 462 t462Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 462 t462Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 1,308 t1,308Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 7,071 t7,071Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 14,939 t14,939

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
24,155 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.38 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.37 t
Under EU ETS
3,172 t, 13% of total

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 8 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 4 of 5 vessel particulars, a name history and a licensed photograph. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type