Ship Emissions Register

Other ship types · Norway flag · built 2000

OSLO WAVE 3

IMO 9208198 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
10,457 t
Fuel burned
3,384 t
Time at sea
3,878 h
Emitted at berth
3% of total
Share of year under way
44%
Gross tonnage
11,894
OSLO WAVE 3
Estormiz, CC0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9208198
Ship type
Other ship types
Gross tonnage
11,894
Length overall
143.0 m
Beam
23.0 m
Year built
2000
Flag state
Norway
Builder
Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Oslo
Ice class
IA
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (15.98 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-19
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 13,607 t201813,6072019: 13,589 t20192020: 13,585 t20202021: 13,900 t20212022: 11,445 t20222023: 10,656 t20232024: 12,640 t20242025: 10,457 t202510,457

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 23.1%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 17.3% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 1.9%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 10,457 3,384 3,878 263 219.9
2024 12,640 4,034 4,866 256 215.8
2023 10,656 3,399 3,796 278 232.4
2022 11,445 3,651 4,338 294 218.7
2021 13,900 4,436 4,779 364 232.2
2020 13,585 4,335 5,462 238 240.1
2019 13,589 4,336 5,503 251 245.6
2018 13,607 4,344 4,928 466 242.8

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 263 t263Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 265 t265Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 1,045 t1,045Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 3,757 t3,757Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 5,390 t5,390

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
10,623 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.17 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.61 t
Under EU ETS
5,377 t, 51% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage