Ship Emissions Register

Other ship types · Singapore flag · built 2000

OSLO WAVE 4

IMO 9208203 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
11,627 t
Fuel burned
3,753 t
Time at sea
4,345 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
50%
Gross tonnage
11,894

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9208203
Ship type
Other ship types
Gross tonnage
11,894
Length overall
142.8 m
Beam
21.5 m
Year built
2000
Flag state
Singapore
Builder
Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Oslo
Ice class
IA
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (15.98 gCO₂/t·nm)
Distance in ice
506 nm
Time in ice
56 h
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-19
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 13,434 t201813,4342019: 12,867 t20192020: 14,381 t20202021: 10,816 t20212022: 12,472 t20222023: 11,904 t20232024: 12,173 t20242025: 11,627 t202511,627

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 13.4%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 4.5% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 0.6%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 11,627 3,753 4,345 279 218.4
2024 12,173 3,888 4,624 297 217.1
2023 11,904 3,799 4,445 272 217.4
2022 12,472 3,979 3,990 299 241.6
2021 10,816 3,452 3,742 394 224.6
2020 14,381 4,583 5,047 373 233.4
2019 12,867 4,108 5,152 319 241.8
2018 13,434 4,281 5,735 533 239.4

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 279 t279Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 281 t281Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 2,137 t2,137Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 4,207 t4,207Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 5,002 t5,002

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
11,812 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.19 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.68 t
Under EU ETS
6,227 t, 54% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage