Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Morocco flag · built 1996

TANGER EXPRESS

IMO 9112777 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
13,959 t
Fuel burned
4,460 t
Time at sea
4,499 h
Emitted at berth
5% of total
Share of year under way
51%
Gross tonnage
14,221
TANGER EXPRESS
Mette_Mols.jpg : Mtlarsen derivative work: Philphos ( talk ), CC BY-SA 3.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9112777
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
14,221
Length overall
136.0 m
Year built
1996
Flag state
Morocco
Builder
Orskov Yard
Port of registry
Tanger
Ice class
IC
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (37.2 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-02-13
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 15,212 t201815,2122019: 14,167 t20192020: 9,567 t20202021: 9,728 t20212022: 14,275 t20222023: 14,455 t20232024: 12,081 t20242025: 13,959 t202513,959

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 8.2%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 15.5% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 15.7%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 13,959 4,460 4,499 692 268.1
2024 12,081 3,872 4,463 2,236 231.6
2023 14,455 4,634 4,379 973 277.1
2022 14,275 4,575 4,202 1,082 278.2
2021 9,728 3,103 2,949 1,738 271.8
2020 9,567 3,065 2,290 818 339.5
2019 14,167 4,544 3,853 1,009 285.1
2018 15,212 4,880 4,316 877 278.3

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 692 t692Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 692 t692Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 157 t157Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 6,332 t6,332Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 6,778 t6,778

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
14,178 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.22 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.80 t
Under EU ETS
7,404 t, 53% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage