TonneMiles

Bulk carrier · Marshall Islands flag · built 2011

ASL VENUS: CO₂ emissions 2022–2025

IMO 9510345 EU ETS4 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
7,364 t
Fuel burned
2,328 t
Time at sea
1,977 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
23%
Gross tonnage
43,024

ASL VENUS against its type

Built in 2011, it is 1 year older than the median bulk carrier on this register, which was built in 2012 (6,882 vessels with a known build year). At 43,024 gross tonnage it is larger than 70% of the other 6,571 bulk carriers with a recorded tonnage. It is one of 1,603 bulk carriers here under the Marshall Islands flag, 19.7% of the 8,138 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 360 other vessels here, 303 of them bulk carriers. Its MRV returns name it ASL VENUS for 2022–2024 and NEW ERA for 2025. The reported port of registry changed: MONROVIA (2022–2024), then Majuro (2025).

Its 7,364 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 2.3 times the median of 3,239 t among the 3,731 bulk carriers on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 305.5 kg CO₂, 17% above the type median of 260.7 kg. It logged 1,977 hours at sea against a median of 1,200 hours for its type that year. 2.1% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for bulk carriers was 3.7%. Across 4 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2025 (7,364 t) and the lowest 2022 (2,056 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 19 in 2022 to 75 in 2024 (lower is more efficient). The one sister ship listed below with a 2025 return reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile.

Emissions by year2022–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 7,364 2,328 — 1,977 152 305.5 10.9 —
2024 2,997 949 9,765 853 0 306.9 10.2 75
2023 3,997 1,267 10,609 955 55 376.7 22.4 98
2022 2,056 649 6,724 546 21 305.7 6.0 19

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9510345
Previously reported as
NEW ERA
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Gross tonnage
43,024
Length overall
228.0 m
Beam
32.0 m
Year built
2011
Flag state
Marshall Islands per EU MRV 2025
Builder
Tsuneishi Shipbuilding
Port of registry
Majuro MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (3.48 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Japan
Accreditation
VS-21325-01
Compliance document issued
2026-09-28
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2024

Position 2,144 of 2,858 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 75th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 7.9; this vessel reported 10.2.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 75th percentile, EEOI 10.2

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 292,360,000 tonne-miles over 9,765 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2022: 2,056 t20222,0562023: 3,997 t20232024: 2,997 t20242025: 7,364 t20257,364

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 258.2% higher than in 2022, for EU/EEA voyages only.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 145.7% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 0.4%.Distance is missing for at least one of the two years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 152 t152Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 152 t152Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 184 t184Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 3,085 t3,085Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 3,943 t3,943Laden voyagesLaden voyages: 3,269 t3,269

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
7,478 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.12 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.42 t

Laden voyages2025

CO₂ on laden voyages
3,269 t, 44% of total
Fuel, laden
1,033 t

The rest of the 2025 total was emitted on ballast legs or at berth.

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 4 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking, 5 of 5 vessel particulars and a name history. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a licensed photograph, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage