Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Greece flag · built 2002

BLUE STAR NAXOS

IMO 9241786 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
37,489 t
Fuel burned
11,991 t
Time at sea
5,380 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
61%
Gross tonnage
10,438
BLUE STAR NAXOS
Χρήστης Tempar52 Original uploader was Templar52 at el.wikipedia, Attribution · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9241786
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
10,438
Length overall
124.0 m
Year built
2002
Flag state
Greece
Builder
Hanwha Ocean
Port of registry
Piraeus
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (43.7 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2026-03-28
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 41,868 t201841,8682019: 39,735 t20192020: 39,263 t20202021: 42,003 t20212022: 40,781 t20222023: 44,020 t20232024: 36,382 t20242025: 37,489 t202537,489

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 10.5%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 3.0% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 5.5%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 37,489 11,991 5,380 568 357.8
2024 36,382 11,677 5,096 593 378.5
2023 44,020 14,133 5,895 356 396.9
2022 40,781 13,093 5,481 318 388.5
2021 42,003 13,486 5,530 279 385.6
2020 39,263 12,604 5,109 330 383.5
2019 39,735 12,608 5,032 1,128 412.2
2018 41,868 13,284 5,303 3,619 405.1

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 568 t568Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 568 t568Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 36,920 t36,920

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
38,077 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.60 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
2.16 t
Under EU ETS
307 t, 1% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2020NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage