Ship Emissions Register

General cargo ship · Netherlands flag · built 2013

EXEBORG

IMO 9650482 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
4,670 t
Fuel burned
1,464 t
Time at sea
3,721 h
Emitted at berth
4% of total
Share of year under way
42%
Gross tonnage
7,680

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9650482
Ship type
General cargo ship
Gross tonnage
7,680
Length overall
144.6 m
Year built
2013
Flag state
Netherlands
Builder
Royal Niestern Sander
Port of registry
Delfzijl
Home port
Delfzijl
Ice class
IA
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (9.59 gCO₂/t·nm)
Distance in ice
459 nm
Time in ice
50 h
Verifier
Bureau Veritas Certification France, France
Accreditation
3-2047 rév. 1
Compliance document issued
2026-05-21
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 5,044 t20185,0442019: 5,618 t20192020: 5,819 t20202021: 6,110 t20212022: 6,074 t20222023: 4,446 t20232024: 6,160 t20242025: 4,670 t20254,670

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 7.4%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 24.2% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 4.9%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 4,670 1,464 3,721 200 124.0
2024 6,160 1,934 4,510 155 130.4
2023 4,446 1,396 3,092 184 142.8
2022 6,074 1,909 3,428 276 128.2
2021 6,110 1,918 4,453 273 134.1
2020 5,819 1,827 3,809 237 143.8
2019 5,618 1,773 4,490 153 149.3
2018 5,044 1,616 4,971 220 130.0

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 200 t200Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 200 t200Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 2,420 t2,420Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 646 t646Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 1,404 t1,404

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
4,741 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.07 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.26 t
Under EU ETS
3,645 t, 78% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
none licensed
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage