Ship Emissions Register

Container/ro-ro cargo ship · Italy flag · built 2004

GRANDE BUENOS AIRES

IMO 9253210 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
27,106 t
Fuel burned
8,664 t
Time at sea
4,245 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
48%
Gross tonnage
56,738
GRANDE BUENOS AIRES
Wolfgang Fricke, CC BY 3.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9253210
Ship type
Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Gross tonnage
56,738
Length overall
213.0 m
Year built
2004
Flag state
Italy
Builder
Fincantieri
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (9.29 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
RINA Services Spa, Italy
Accreditation
002O
Compliance document issued
2026-02-20
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 15,190 t201815,1902019: 19,292 t20192020: 21,323 t20202021: 15,612 t20212022: 26,134 t20222023: 29,762 t20232024: 28,929 t20242025: 27,106 t202527,106

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 78.4%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 6.3% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 1.5%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 27,106 8,664 4,245 608 464.8
2024 28,929 9,256 3,996 741 471.8
2023 29,762 9,513 4,297 634 462.2
2022 26,134 8,359 4,008 825 427.7
2021 15,612 4,982 2,439 666 400.0
2020 21,323 6,804 3,047 1,199 443.7
2019 19,292 6,158 2,862 951 422.1
2018 15,190 4,837 2,251 766 439.5

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 608 t608Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 711 t711Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 4,572 t4,572Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 12,271 t12,271Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 9,551 t9,551

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
27,531 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.43 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.56 t
Under EU ETS
16,195 t, 60% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage