Ship Emissions Register

Container/ro-ro cargo ship · Italy flag · built 1998

GRANDE EUROPA

IMO 9138381 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
27,962 t
Fuel burned
8,921 t
Time at sea
5,045 h
Emitted at berth
5% of total
Share of year under way
58%
Gross tonnage
51,714
GRANDE EUROPA
Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9138381
Ship type
Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Gross tonnage
51,714
Length overall
183.0 m
Year built
1998
Flag state
Italy
Builder
Regio Cantiere di Castellammare di Stabia
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (10.23 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
RINA Services Spa, Italy
Accreditation
002O
Compliance document issued
2026-02-04
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 33,076 t201833,0762019: 16,370 t20192020: 27,574 t20202021: 12,811 t20212022: 22,238 t20222023: 28,267 t20232024: 33,111 t20242025: 27,962 t202527,962

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 15.5%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 15.6% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 6.0%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 27,962 8,921 5,045 1,362 393.2
2024 33,111 10,586 5,392 1,555 418.4
2023 28,267 9,017 5,057 1,553 411.8
2022 22,238 7,099 4,355 1,467 372.3
2021 12,811 4,094 2,238 822 340.8
2020 27,574 8,782 4,489 1,321 362.1
2019 16,370 5,220 2,433 468 447.0
2018 33,076 10,550 5,028 1,272 393.0

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 1,362 t1,362Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 1,362 t1,362Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 14,191 t14,191Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 5,325 t5,325Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 7,084 t7,084

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
28,400 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.45 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.61 t
Under EU ETS
21,758 t, 78% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage