Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Italy flag · built 2003

LA SUPREMA

IMO 9214288 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
109,805 t
Fuel burned
35,237 t
Time at sea
5,142 h
Emitted at berth
6% of total
Share of year under way
59%
Gross tonnage
49,257
LA SUPREMA
Twice25, CC BY 2.5 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9214288
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
49,257
Length overall
211.0 m
Year built
2003
Flag state
Italy
Builder
Nuovi Cantieri Apuania
Port of registry
Palermo
Home port
Palermo
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (30.63 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Grandi Navi Veloci
Verifier
RINA Services Spa, Italy
Accreditation
002O
Compliance document issued
2026-03-02
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 73,743 t201873,7432019: 102,720 t20192020: 82,658 t20202021: 70,273 t20212022: 98,913 t20222023: 109,112 t20232024: 102,677 t20242025: 109,805 t2025109,805

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 48.9%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 6.9% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 1.9%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 109,805 35,237 5,142 7,008 982.2
2024 102,677 32,937 4,701 6,491 1,001.3
2023 109,112 35,012 5,184 5,445 946.1
2022 98,913 31,725 5,274 6,580 861.0
2021 70,273 22,275 3,631 5,587 875.0
2020 82,658 26,503 5,015 5,076 761.1
2019 102,720 32,934 5,994 6,744 779.3
2018 73,743 23,650 4,115 4,141 814.6

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 7,008 t7,008Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 7,008 t7,008Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 40,503 t40,503Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 30,803 t30,803Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 31,491 t31,491

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
111,535 t
Methane (CH₄)
1.76 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
6.34 t
Under EU ETS
78,658 t, 72% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage