Ship Emissions Register

Container ship · Portugal flag · built 2006

EF OLIVIA

IMO 9252735 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
0 t
Gross tonnage
35,881
EF OLIVIA
Wolfgang Fricke, CC BY 3.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9252735
Previously reported as
INDEPENDENT VISION
Ship type
Container ship
Gross tonnage
35,881
Length overall
220.3 m
Year built
2006
Flag state
Portugal
Builder
Szczecin Shipyard
Port of registry
Madeira
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (14.4 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Peter Döhle Schiffahrts-KG
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-25
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Efficiency against its own type2024

Position 1,228 of 1,661 qualifying container ships by EEOI, at the 74th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 15.4; this vessel reported 23.4.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 74th percentile, EEOI 23.4

Across the 56 ranked vessels operated by Peter Döhle Schiffahrts-KG, the median percentile is 69. This vessel is less efficient than its own fleet median.

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 697,461,966 tonn-nmover 37,232 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 23,126 t201823,1262019: 40,229 t20192020: 35,565 t20202021: 37,237 t20212022: 22,846 t20222023: 20,192 t20232024: 16,321 t20242025: 0 t20250

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 100.0%.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 0 0 0 0
2024 16,321 5,239 37,232 2,998 354 438.4 23.4 74
2023 20,192 6,484 43,989 3,431 859 459.0 17.8 52
2022 22,846 7,334 46,969 3,245 862 486.4 20.9 60
2021 37,237 11,957 91,436 6,246 523 407.2 19.3 59
2020 35,565 11,421 97,150 6,767 787 366.1 22.5 70
2019 40,229 12,918 97,494 6,673 598 412.6 23.4 68
2018 23,126 7,401 47,287 3,307 824 489.1 29.1 10

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
yes
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
yes
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage