Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Denmark flag · built 2017

EXPRESS 3

IMO 9793064 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
35,191 t
Fuel burned
10,976 t
Time at sea
3,506 h
Emitted at berth
2% of total
Share of year under way
40%
Gross tonnage
10,842
EXPRESS 3
Johan Wessman / News Oresund, CC BY 2.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9793064
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
10,842
Length overall
109.0 m
Year built
2017
Flag state
Denmark
Builder
Incat
Port of registry
Aarhus
Home port
Aarhus
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (1.1 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Molslinjen, Molslinjen
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2026-03-31
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from the reported port of registry, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 49,601 t201849,6012019: 46,007 t20192020: 34,756 t20202021: 45,870 t20212022: 43,311 t20222023: 44,633 t20232024: 36,190 t20242025: 35,191 t202535,191

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ fell by 29.1%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 2.8% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 0.4%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 35,191 10,976 3,506 826 391.9
2024 36,190 11,288 3,292 0 393.5
2023 44,633 13,922 3,635 606 407.9
2022 43,311 13,509 3,459 627 403.0
2021 45,870 14,308 3,412 633 411.8
2020 34,756 10,841 2,562 733 419.6
2019 46,007 14,350 3,212 656 440.8
2018 49,601 15,471 3,713 597 447.5

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 826 t826Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 826 t826Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 34,364 t34,364

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
35,730 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.55 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.98 t
Under EU ETS
35,191 t, 100% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2020NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage