Ship Emissions Register

Ro-pax ship · Finland flag · built 2000

FINBO CARGO

IMO 9181106 EU ETS7 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
32,473 t
Fuel burned
10,137 t
Time at sea
5,068 h
Emitted at berth
7% of total
Share of year under way
58%
Gross tonnage
22,152
FINBO CARGO
Sam, CC BY-SA 4.0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9181106
Ship type
Ro-pax ship
Gross tonnage
22,152
Length overall
180.0 m
Beam
24.0 m
Year built
2000
Flag state
Finland
Builder
Astilleros Españoles
Port of registry
Eckerö
Home port
Eckerö
Ice class
IA
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (23.9 gCO₂/t·nm)
Operator
Eckerö Line
Verifier
NORMEC VERIFAVIA SAS, France
Accreditation
3-2127
Compliance document issued
2026-03-28
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2019: 28,025 t201928,0252020: 22,358 t20202021: 34,717 t20212022: 27,299 t20222023: 30,350 t20232024: 33,284 t20242025: 32,473 t202532,473

Between 2019 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 15.9%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 2.4% and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 3.0%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2019–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 32,473 10,137 5,068 2,324 446.3
2024 33,284 10,382 5,068 2,565 459.9
2023 30,350 9,472 4,829 2,648 453.9
2022 27,299 8,650 4,238 4,548 499.3
2021 34,717 10,998 4,500 3,750 527.3
2020 22,358 7,094 3,643 1,363 489.2
2019 28,025 8,920 3,283 3,070 596.5

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 2,324 t2,324Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 2,324 t2,324Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 30,149 t30,149

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
32,971 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.51 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.82 t
Under EU ETS
31,604 t, 97% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2019VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2020NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance

A change of accredited verifier is shown because it matters for audit and data continuity. It is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
7
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
5 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type