Ship Emissions Register

Container/ro-ro cargo ship · Gibraltar flag · built 1998

GRANDE AFRICA

IMO 9130949 EU ETS8 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
18,617 t
Fuel burned
5,937 t
Time at sea
3,449 h
Emitted at berth
5% of total
Share of year under way
39%
Gross tonnage
56,642
GRANDE AFRICA
Tvabutzku1234, CC0 · File

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9130949
Ship type
Container/ro-ro cargo ship
Gross tonnage
56,642
Length overall
214.0 m
Year built
1998
Flag state
Gibraltar
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency (design)
EIV (8.11 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
RINA Services Spa, Italy
Accreditation
002O
Compliance document issued
2026-02-17
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Flag state is derived from rapportert, not reported directly, and reflects the registry at the time of reporting.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 16,974 t201816,9742019: 17,751 t20192020: 11,045 t20202021: 12,626 t20212022: 16,539 t20222023: 16,327 t20232024: 13,952 t20242025: 18,617 t202518,617

Between 2018 and 2025 reported CO₂ rose by 9.7%.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions rose 33.4% and CO₂ per nautical mile rose 2.6%.Distance was not reported for both years, so activity and efficiency cannot be separated here.

Annual returns2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 18,617 5,937 3,449 928 417.9
2024 13,952 4,439 2,405 1,129 407.5
2023 16,327 5,198 2,817 962 400.8
2022 16,539 5,276 2,942 1,062 381.6
2021 12,626 4,027 2,472 526 358.8
2020 11,045 3,521 1,754 1,216 445.9
2019 17,751 5,662 2,681 756 387.5
2018 16,974 5,409 2,976 741 380.5

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 928 t928Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 928 t928Voyages between EEA portsVoyages between EEA ports: 2,780 t2,780Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 9,973 t9,973Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 4,935 t4,935

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
18,908 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.30 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
1.07 t
Under EU ETS
11,162 t, 60% of total

Sources and how to read this

What this page is built on

Reporting years
8
Ranked by efficiency
no
Vessel particulars
4 of 5
Movement data
not observed
Name history
none recorded
Photograph
yes
Sanctions record
none
Inspection record
none in US waters
Caveats that apply to every vessel page

EEOI above 100,000 is withheld. Those values come from returns where reported transport work is near zero, which makes the ratio meaningless rather than extreme. Median across the dataset is around 12.

Emission categories overlap. In the MRV return, emissions at berth are also counted inside the voyage legs, so the categories do not sum to the total. They are shown side by side rather than stacked for that reason.

Distance is derived, intensity is reported. The MRV return publishes CO₂ per nautical mile but not the distance itself, which is null in all 106,564 rows of the source. The distance column is therefore filled from the ranking step, which reconstructs it, and is blank for years where a vessel was not ranked. That is why a row can show an intensity without a distance.

Percentile is within type and year. It is the vessel's position among qualifying ships of the same type that year, where lower is more efficient. A blank means the vessel did not qualify for ranking that year.

Sister ships share a builder, a type and a build year within two years of this vessel. That holds hull and machinery roughly constant and leaves operation as the variable, which is why they are listed before nearest-by-tonnage.

Methane and nitrous oxide start in 2024. They were not reported before that period, so earlier years cannot be compared against them.

Technical efficiency is a design figure fixed at construction. A vessel can hold a good index and still emit heavily by sailing fast, waiting at anchor or carrying little.

Inspection records cover United States waters only. An empty record is not evidence of a clean history elsewhere.

Empty means unreported, never zero. Nothing here is modelled, estimated or interpolated. See the methodology.

Something wrong on this page? See corrections. We do not hold the source registers and cannot amend them, but we will fix anything we have got wrong in reproducing them.

Comparable vesselsnearest by tonnage, same type