TonneMiles

Bulk carrier · Portugal flag · built 2014

LEFKES: CO₂ emissions 2018–2025

IMO 9658783 EU ETS7 reporting years

CO₂ reported 2025
1,262 t
Fuel burned
402 t
Distance
7,164 nm
Time at sea
638 h
Emitted at berth
4% of total
Share of year under way
7%

LEFKES against its type

Built in 2014, it is 2 years newer than the median bulk carrier on this register, which was built in 2012 (6,882 vessels with a known build year). It is one of 157 bulk carriers here under the Portugal flag, 1.9% of the 8,138 on the register. The same builder is recorded for 307 other vessels here, 48 of them bulk carriers. The reported port of registry changed: Panama (2021–2023), then Madeira (2024–2025).

Its 1,262 t of CO₂ for 2025 is 61% below the median of 3,238 t among the 3,732 bulk carriers on this register that reported for 2025. Per nautical mile it emitted 176.1 kg CO₂, 32% below the type median of 260.7 kg. It logged 638 hours at sea against a median of 1,199 hours for its type that year. 4.3% of its 2025 emissions were at berth; the median for bulk carriers was 3.7%. Across 7 years with reported emissions, the highest was 2023 (5,754 t) and the lowest 2025 (1,262 t). Its efficiency percentile within the type went from 57 in 2018 to 88 in 2025 (lower is more efficient). Of the 5 sister ships listed below with a 2025 return, 0 reported a lower CO₂ per nautical mile than this vessel.

Emissions by year2018–2025

Year CO₂ (t) Fuel (t) Distance (nm) At sea (h) At berth (t) kg CO₂/nm EEOI Percentile
2025 1,262 402 7,164 638 55 176.1 12.1 88
2024 2,802 893 12,757 1,232 242 219.6 9.6 69
2023 5,754 1,838 28,185 2,932 567 204.2 8.4 56
2021 4,300 1,358 18,826 1,550 157 228.4 8.3 48
2020 5,141 1,625 20,761 1,849 582 247.6 12.5 87
2019 4,384 1,402 16,849 1,833 196 260.2 11.1 78
2018 4,645 1,482 21,287 1,973 201 218.2 8.8 57

Vessel particulars

IMO number
9658783
Ship type
Bulk carrier
Year built
2014
Flag state
Portugal per EU MRV 2025
Sources disagree: Wikidata/AIS (undated) list Panama. The flag shown is from the newest official source, the EU MRV return for 2025.
Builder
Shin Kurushima Dockyard
Port of registry
Madeira MRV 2025
Technical efficiency (design)
EEXI (6.02 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verifier
DNV, Germany
Accreditation
VS-16026-01
Compliance document issued
2026-03-01
Compliance document expires
2027-06-30

Efficiency against its own type2025

Position 2,856 of 3,241 qualifying bulk carriers by EEOI, at the 88th percentile. The dashed line is the type median, 7.6; this vessel reported 12.1.

0255075100more efficientless efficientThis vessel: 88th percentile, EEOI 12.1

EEOI divides emissions by transport work, which for this vessel and year was 103,935,750 tonne-miles over 7,164 nautical miles.

Reported CO₂ by year

2018: 4,645 t20184,6452019: 4,384 t20192020: 5,141 t20202021: 4,300 t20212023: 5,754 t20232024: 2,802 t20242025: 1,262 t20251,262

Reported CO₂ in 2025 was 72.8% lower than in 2018, for EU/EEA voyages only. No return is recorded for 2022, so the series has gaps.

From 2024 to 2025, emissions fell 55.0% while distance sailed fell 43.8%and CO₂ per nautical mile fell 19.8%.That points mainly to how much the vessel sailed, rather than the other.

Where the 2025 emissions occurred

At berthAt berth: 55 t55Within EEA portsWithin EEA ports: 66 t66Voyages to an EEA portVoyages to an EEA port: 589 t589Voyages from an EEA portVoyages from an EEA port: 607 t607

Methane, nitrous oxide and EU ETS2025

Total CO₂ equivalent
1,282 t
Methane (CH₄)
0.02 t
Nitrous oxide (N₂O)
0.07 t
Under EU ETS
664 t, 53% of total

Verifier history

From reporting yearVerifierAccredited in
2018VERIFAVIA (UK) LTDUnited Kingdom
2020NORMEC VERIFAVIA SASFrance
2023DNVGermany

A change of verifier is not in itself a sign of anything being wrong.

Sources and how to read this

This page draws on 7 MRV reporting years, an efficiency ranking and 3 of 5 vessel particulars. Not found in the sources for this vessel: AIS movements in Norwegian waters, a name history, a licensed photograph, a sanctions listing and US port state inspections.

Empty means unreported, never zero. How EEOI, distance, percentiles and sister ships are handled is explained under reading a vessel page. Something wrong? See corrections.

Comparable vesselssister ships and nearest by tonnage